Photo: Pixabay
Paris’s appeals court ruled that Frederic Desnard suffered from “bore out”, which is technically the opposite of burnout, where an employee is overworked. The former manager’s lawyer claimed that the complete lack of stimulation at work had left the man feeling “destroyed” and “ashamed”, even triggering an epileptic fit when he was driving. “I went into depression,” Desnard told AFP in 2016. “I was ashamed to be paid to do nothing. The worse part of it was denying this suffering.”Desnard said that he was asked to do nothing but menial tasks over the course of four years, an experience he described as “a descent into hell”. These tasks allegedly involved setting up the CEO’s new tablet and letting a plumber into his boss’s home. Interparfum defended itself by arguing that Frederic Desnard had not complained about his boring job and lack of stimulation during his four years at the company, but only after learning that he was going to be made redundant.
Although “bore out” wasn’t even a term recognized by French law when Desnard sued his former employer in 2014, the Paris Court of Appeal ruled that bore out was indeed a form of moral harassment. It didn’t order Interparfum to pay its former manager $400,000 as he had originally requested, instead opting for little over 10 percent of that as compensation. What was originally considered a joke among law experts has now become the first such verdict of its kind in France, and will likely be cited as a precedent in future cases. Suing employers for lack of work or boredom may actually become a thing in the near future…