
Photo: Rilke/Wikimedia Commons

Photo via Radio Liberty
Three months after the border crossing incident, Alexei Novikov was put on Russia’s criminal wanted list, and on January 29, 2016, he was detained, charged with “illegal acquisition of narcotic drugs” as well as “drug smuggling” and taken 800 km away from his home to a maximum security detention center. In November of 2016, Novikov was sentenced to 10 years and one month in a strict regime prison colony. Alexei’s lawyer claims that the case is a disgrace to the Russian justice system, and claims that there is clear proof that the prosecution presented forged evidence in court. For example, the tag used to seal the bag seized from his client was not the one presented in court – the first had the signature of the senior officer present at the border crossing at the time of the confiscation, while the one examined by a state expert is signed by another officer, who had finished his shift before Alexei arrived at the border post. Furthermore, the bag presented in court did not feature the aforementioned Spanish description of the contents, and in the report of the border guard who inspected Alexei’s backpack, the line “dark green substance with a mint smell” was replaced with “a brown substance with a sharp, specific smell”.
Photo via Radio Liberty
Andrei Vlasov, Novikov’s lawyer, claims that Judge Beloborodov from the Isilkul Town Court didn’t even consider all this proof of evidence tampering, and since the expert’s report concluded that the confiscated substance tested positive for “synthetic cannabinoids” also known as ‘Spice’, she convicted Alexei to over a decade in prison. Despite all the issues highlighted by Novikov’s lawyer in court, he has been rotting in prison ever since the judge’s verdict. His lawyer appealed to higher courts, and produced even more proof of faulty evidence from the prosecution, including the narcotic expert’s report. The expert did not substantiate why he referred the substance to narcotics – there are no descriptions, graphs, no references to scientific data, although the federal law requires that the expert’s conclusions be scientific, repeatable, verifiable. In addition, the study was conducted on unchecked equipment – there is no information that the gas chromatograph, used by the expert, passed, as it should, an annual check. I insist that this is not an expert conclusion, but speculation that the court did not check,” Yulia Kopeikina, a lawyer working with Vlasov, told Novaya Gazeta.
Photo via Novaya Gazeta
“How could Novikov know or suppose that there are narcotic substances in the tea that he bought on the Internet? He did not hide from the border guards, and he went to the checkpoint by naivety, and did not try to hide the package, kept it in a backpack in a conspicuous place and showed it at the first request,” lawyer Sergei Eremin added. “The article on which he was convicted suggests direct intent, and if he is not, then there can be no crime. Both the city court of Isilkul and the Omsk regional court violated the fundamental principle of a civilized state – the presumption of innocence.” Last month, Alexei’s lawyer managed to get his case reviewed by another panel of judges, who dismissed the charge of “acquisition of narcotic drugs” but maintained that of “smuggling of drugs”. They decided to leave the accused’s prison sentence unchanged – 10 years and one month. Alexei Novikov’s case has become a central focus of Russian human rights activists who have vowed to seek a repeal and file another complaint to the Supreme Court of the Russian Federation.
Photo: Jubair1985/Wikimedia Commons
In the meantime, Novikov is stuck in prison, his wife has been stripped of parental rights and their daughter is now in the care of her grandmother. So the next time you’re in Russia and happen to be carrying anything that could draw the attention of customs or border officers, maybe just throw it away, just to be sure… Sources: Radio Liberty, Novaya Gazeta, Om1