
Photo: Tyler Bell/Flickr
Although it’s easy to view Monte Testaccio as a huge pile of randomly discarded amphorae, archaeological evidence proves that that is not the case. Excavations carried out in the early 1990s revealed a well-thought-out terraced system with retaining walls made of nearly intact amphorae filled with smaller pieces of pottery to keep them in place. Also, lime appears to have been poured over the debris to neutralize the smell of rancid oil.
One of the questions that have been puzzling historians and archaeologists for decades is why the Romans chose to discard millions of amphorae y piling them up into a huge mound. Broken amphorae were usually recycled as drain pipes, flower pots, or broken down into small pieces to be used as an ingredient for a type of concrete known as opus signinum.
Experts have several reasons to believe that the types of amphorae that make up the bulk of Monte Testaccio, known as Dressel 20, were particularly hard to recycle because they broke into large curved fragments that could not be turned into smaller shards. Using the fragments as ingredients for concrete was also impractical because the pottery absorbed oil and the chemical reaction of the oil with lime made the resulting concrete unsatisfactory. For these reasons, the Romans may have considered discarding the broken amphorae as the best solution.
Once a glorified trash heap, Monte Testaccio played several roles through the centuries. It played a critical part in the defense of Rome by Giuseppe Garibaldi against the French army, was used as the hill of Golgotha in passion plays, and as a picnicking spot. Today, it lies abandoned, but definitely not forgotten.